LR°

01AI EVALUATION · TASK DESIGN · QUALITY ASSURANCE

What my resume doesn’t show.

Real-world workflows. Ambiguous requests. Clear evaluation, backed by evidence.

01
Ambiguous request

Real problem, unclear inputs.

→
02
Evidence

Find and verify the right sources.

→
03
Constraints & decisions

Resolve gates, trade-offs and dependencies.

→
04
Expected outcome

Define a clear, reviewable success state.

150+

Evaluation tasks

600+

Contributor submissions reviewed

40+

Financial-services scenarios

4.7+/5

Quality rating

02FEATURED WORK

The work itself is the proof.

Realistic scenarios. Explicit constraints. Verifiable expected outcomes.

View all work
01OPERATIONS / EVIDENCE
CLEARBAYIncident briefing
SCENARIO
Evidence trail
01Intake checklistHinge intact
02Final inspectionDamage recorded
03Internal handoffApproved recovery
Evaluation criteria
Source authorityCurrent contactNo inferred fault
Custody ≠ proof of fault

ClearBay — Fleet Incident Briefing

Evidence synthesisSource authorityStakeholder resolution
View case study
02CUSTOMER SUPPORT / POLICY
VALLEY SMARTAGRepeat-outage review
SCENARIO
Policy & dependencies
01Current SOPReject old template
02Dev Time BudgetAsk the user
03Public fallbackApproval required
Decision boundaries
Consistent budgetNo promised fix dateDisclose tool limit
48 h budget ≠ a promised fix date

Valley SmartAG — Repeat-Outage Review

Policy precedenceMissing informationSafe fallback
View case study
03AI / RELEASE OPERATIONS
GLITCH GARDENVerdant Reckoning
SCENARIO
Expected decision path
CI ↓Board → Ready↓Publish → Close
Release gates
Correct branchValidated CIExactly one postClose task last
Publish only after the CI gate passes

Glitch Garden — Verdant Reckoning Launch

Readiness evaluationRisk analysisGo / no-go
View case study
03METHODOLOGY · AI EVALUATION

A simple approach for complex work.

How I turn evaluation criteria into consistent, defensible judgments.

01
Scope

Understand the task, context, and what a successful response or run should look like.

→
02
Grounding

Translate guidelines, policies, and evidence into clear grading criteria.

→
03
Evaluation

Assess the model’s behavior against the criteria, constraints, and expected outcome.

→
04
Adjudication

Resolve ambiguity and reach a consistent, defensible judgment.

CONTEXT BEHIND THE WORK

Business experience keeps the evaluation grounded.

Hands-on experience across operations, finance, procurement and cross-functional delivery helps me distinguish a plausible answer from one that would actually hold up in a live workflow.

OPERATIONSAuthority, handoffs, dependencies
QUALITYReview, adjudication, consistency
TASK DESIGNAmbiguity, gates, verifiable outcomes